Can get this Charm Blue note5 of the public test qualifications are really very lucky, thanks to Aunt Zhang this time a variety of public testing activities, gossip less, the following into our charm blue note5 mobile phone evaluation of the text.
The structure of this paper is roughly as follows:
One, out of the box picture
Second, the appearance of mobile phones and mobile hardware
Third, charge and endurance ability evaluation (compared with red rice pro)
Fourth, camera evaluation (in contrast with red rice pro)
V. System Assessment (Compare with Xiaomi MIUI and LeEUI)
Sixth, summary
————————I'm a gorgeous dividing line————————
One, out of the box picture
December 24 on duty in the company, received a phone call SF Express, get back to see Aunt Zhang dedicated box will know that the charm blue note5 phone arrived, in the office can not wait to unpack.
Open the box dedicated to Zhang Aunt, the first thing that catches the eye is the public notices and the notes on the blue note5 phone. The mobile phone case is wrapped in a plastic protective cover. The protection is very good. There are special stickers for Zhang Aunt. The design of the mobile phone's packaging box is still very simple, the front and side are very intuitive "charm blue note5 - youth good product", the back is a sticker form of the phone's specific configuration and information.
Second, the appearance of mobile phones and mobile hardware
1, the appearance of the phone
The Meizu has adopted the metal integrated body for the first time on the charm blue note5 mobile phone. The front is a 5.5-inch full-HD 2.5D glass screen. The upper part of the front is the handset, the lower part is the mTouch-type round fingerprint identification key, and the back is 13 million pixels. The main camera and flash, the left side of the fuselage for the card slot, the right is the volume key and power button, the top of the fuselage is relatively simple, only one microphone, and the bottom is a collection of headphones, microphone, USB port and speakers, layout Closer. In general, Meizu’s effort on the charm blue note5 phone is still quite large. The appearance is not much different than the previous generation, but the craft is more refined. The cutting links of the mobile phone are handled in detail. The hand feels very good, and the back has a frosted finish, it is difficult to keep the fingerprint and it is not easy to slip off. If you say it is regrettable, personally feel that the processing of the bottom hole of the mobile phone is simply too rough, like forcing a series of hole slots. Together, there is no beauty in the slightest, but it does not hide, you can also be worthy of a face value in the thousands of machines.
2, mobile hardware
The hardware configuration of the mobile phone is described in detail on the official website. We will not go into details here. The specific use of results, from the use of the two-month experience I think is fully adequate, and now in this mobile phone manufacturers and consumers are respected under the context of cost-effective supremacy, Meizu's "just right" principle is commendable.
Third, charge and endurance ability evaluation (compared with red rice pro)
In order to test Charm blue note5's charging and endurance, I compared it with another red rice pro in my hand. The basic information of the two is as follows.
Charm blue note5: 4000 Ma, support 18W fast charge;
Red rice pro: 4050 mA, does not support fast charge, only 5V2A charge.
1, charging speed comparison
Before the test, I released the battery power of both phones to 1%. I wanted to release it to the automatic shutdown. However, I did not expect that the last 1% of the battery power was so resistant to use. Both mobile phones were like this. 1% started.
Through the line chart we can see that Charm Blue note5 is fully charged for a total of 92 minutes, almost no difference with the official said 90 minutes, the speed is still very good, especially the charging rate between the beginning of charging 30 minutes to 75 minutes The fastest; Red Rice pro is a mobile phone that does not support fast charging in the first 90 minutes of performance is very good, although has always lagged behind the charm blue note5, but there is no difference too much, but from the 90 to 100 of the ten electricity It took me 29 minutes and I was surprised at this.
2. Comparison of power consumption
In the case of full power, the two mobile phones were watched in 60 minutes, 30 minutes in music, 40 minutes in games and 20 minutes in WeChat video calls. The specific conditions are shown below.
Through the chart, we can see that after two and a half hours of continuous use of multiple functions, the two mobile phones consume a considerable amount of power, and the battery life is still very good. In general, there is no problem in using one day. Another point to explain is that the game I tested is fun, it is also a wonderful gift in the mobile phone evaluation, haha. One more digression, because I usually do not play games, and all have not tested the performance of the phone's game, but according to the Internet, although there is occasional delay in the game but there is occasional delay, so the game performance requirements of the mobile phone The high one should be carefully considered. If you don't play big games, just use it everyday, absolutely absolutely enough.
Fourth, camera evaluation (in contrast with red rice pro)
In this part, I still compare the camera performance and effect of Charm Blue note5 and Redm pro. The two cameras are also one of their hottest selling points when Red Rice Pro is released. However, it turns out that Red Rice Pro The performance of the two cameras is not satisfactory. The following will be a specific evaluation. First of all, I will compare the camera interface of the two mobile phones, and then compare the photographs of the two mobile phones under the same scene. The following pictures are arranged in the order of the charm blue note5 and the red rice pro.
1, camera interface. The camera interface of the two mobile phones is relatively simple. It integrates shortcut keys such as HDR, flash, and filters. The camera setting interface is also intuitive and easy to understand. The camera's camera features an image editing and beautifying function. The front camera takes pictures. Bring your own beauty, can meet the daily needs.
2, daytime outdoor proofs
3, daytime indoor proofs
4, night indoor proofs
5, night outdoor proofs
The main parameters of the two mobile phones are the same, the main camera with 13 million pixels (red rice pro is the aperture of F2.0, the charm blue note5 is the aperture of F2.2), and the front camera with 5 million pixels is now priced similarly. The same as a thousand Yuan machine is comparable.
Because it is not a professional assessment, I try to restore my intuitive feelings. From the above several sets of comparative proofs, we can see that the effect of Charm blue note5 in the daytime is still very good, and it can clearly and accurately restore the colors of the scenery and objects.
In the first group of daytime outdoor proofs, the charm blue note5 can accurately restore the original appearance of the buildings across the street in cloudy and hazy conditions, and the brightness is moderate. In contrast, the red rice pro can restore the original appearance of the building accurately. But the overall color of the photo is dim. The aperture of red rice pro is even larger than the aperture of charm blue note5, but the amount of light entering is not as good as charm blue note5. This is also reflected in other proofs.
The second group of daytime outdoor proofs is a set of buildings and sky outside the window that I photographed in the office across the window, tentatively considered outdoor proofs. In this set of proofs, the photos of the two mobile phones are very good. Red rice pro is more realistic in restoring the sky colors, and the effect is better. The sky color of the charm blue note5 seems to be somewhat biased and the blue rendering is too hard.
Daytime indoor proofs of the two photographing effects are comparable, red rice pro details of the details of the more detailed, the charm of blue note5 color expression better, it seems that charm blue note5 is always a more vivid color rendering, I I think this can also be the reason why the photos taken by them are brighter than the red rice pro, but I personally still prefer the effect of the charm blue note5, and I feel more beautiful.
The performance of the indoor proofs at night was almost the same, but also the difference in brightness and color, the reduction of the details is more consistent, or in an acceptable range.
The last set of nighttime outdoor proofs was the worst performer, and both phones were not performing well. They may also be related to the weather conditions when photographing, and cloudy and hazy. The red rice pro clearly reflects the outline of the lights on the building, and the ground feel is also relatively clear, but the charm blue note5 visually makes people feel that the entire photo is blurred and the smear is too serious. The night-time imaging effects of the two mobile phones were unsatisfactory, but as a thousand-yuan machine, their photo effects during the day were still very good, in line with expectations.
In summary, I think that the photo function of Charm Blue note5 is remarkable, and it can be said to be the best in this price range. It can fully meet the needs of photographing in most of the daily scenes. It may be that the effect of the night is almost, but does not rule out the weather conditions that I photographed. In short, it is still very good.
V. System Assessment (Compare with Xiaomi MIUI and LeEUI)
For Meizu's flyme system because it has not been used before, so the first time it is still quite new, Meizu declared that the first charm blue note5 for flyme6 system adapter, but did not do, because there is no application for closed beta, so the following The comparative system versions are Meizu Flyme 5.2.11.1A, Xiaomi MIUI8.1.2.0 and LeEui EUI5.9.020S_12221.
In the three systems, Meizu and Xiaomi are the leading mobile phone manufacturers in China, and LeTV is a rising star. The three have their own advantages and regret.
1, mobile desktop. There are no secondary desktops in all three systems, and all applications are directly displayed on the primary desktop. The overall layout is similar. The following figure shows the three mobile phone desktops under the system default theme.
2, mobile phone butler. The three systems all come with mobile phone butlers. They all seem to be developed by themselves. Meizu's mobile butler function is still relatively mature compared to LeTV and Xiaomi. Each function is also very complete. Personally feel that it is not necessary to download third-party security. Applied. Here is a special mention of LeTV's mobile phone system. Before January 3, its butler function was not even a bad idea. It was very difficult to use, but it was perfected after updating to EUI5.9 on January 3. The steward function also serves its own system.
3, shortcut menu. Millet and Meizu are drop-down shortcut menus, while LeTV needs to use the function keys in the lower left corner to activate the shortcut menu. At the same time, there is a task management interface. Xiaomi, Meizu and the task management interface need to be mobilized separately. Quick menus can be freely edited according to your needs.
4, system settings interface. The three system setup interfaces are also similar, and there is not much to say. Special mention Meizu in the system settings interface search function, very good use, you can search for the target, eliminating the trouble of the search.
5, screenshot function. The screenshots of the three systems are all perfect. All of them support long screenshots, but the methods of operation are different. After millet screenshots are saved by default, and a floating effect diagram is formed in the upper right corner of the screen, you can touch to select long shots or Editing, long screenshots are automatically scrolled screenshots; music as the screen directly after the editing page appears, you can choose to take long shots or edit or save, long screenshots are automatically scrolling the screen; Meizu long shots are more troublesome, you need to press the volume down The key and power button will evoke long shots, but need to be manually selected by sliding the screen. Select the cut-out area and save it. Individuals prefer the style of LeTV. And LeTV's three-finger screenshot is very fun. The following is the effect of three-finger screenshots.
6, dial, contacts, yellow pages, text messages, weather, calendars, notes and so on. The function is similar, there is not much difference, do not elaborate. Here's a comparison of the Yellow Pages and a comparison of LeTV's two good-looking desktops and live broadcasts. Personally I feel that I am not using it. At least I am rarely used. I have not known that the music ecology is music.
The first time you use the Meizu system. Because the evaluation is mainly for the charm blue note5 mobile phone, let alone talk about the experience of the flyme system. Meizu's flyme system has been very complete, all functions are perfect, the system optimization is also very good, daily use is very smooth, the page switching animation effects and icon drawing are also very small fresh style, in line with young people Features, and easy-to-use large fonts, easy to use for the elderly. Hope to update flyme6 will bring a better experience.
Sixth, summary
1, advantages:
(1) All-metal body, excellent workmanship, high face value;
(2) 4000 mAh battery, which will be fully charged in 90 minutes and lasting for a long time;
(3) Prioritize the flyme6 system (though not yet);
(4) Pre-fingerprint recognition function, personally feel better than rear-end;
(5) The camera is superior in thousands of machines.
2. Disadvantages:
(1) There is room for improvement in the appearance details;
(2) The traditional USB socket adopted does not use the type-c socket which is now widely used. It is a small regret.
(3) The charger is large and unsightly, momentarily pulls down the whole machine, and the charging line is relatively short;
(4) The recent increase in the price of 100 does not know whether or not, okay, not too bad, on the one hand to prove that this machine is selling on the one hand, on the other hand, as manufacturers say, the cost rises, in order to ensure the quality, have to rise Price.
In short, I personally feel that the charm blue note5 can be called the king of the thousand-yuan machine. I found almost no shortcomings in my use of more than half a month. It is a product with sincerity, bought for parents or for personal use. Are very, very, very good!
Finally, once again thanked Zhang Auntie for giving me such a rare opportunity for public test. She will always support Zhang Aunt and wish Zhang Ama is getting better and better.
Brake Disc For FORD
Ford Brake Disc,Ford Auto Brake Disc,Ford Car Brake Disc,Ford Automobile Brake Disc
Zhoushan Shenying Filter Manufacture Co., Ltd. , https://www.renkenfilter.com