The United States' well-known public policy think tank "New US Security Center" pointed out in a recent report that "a flexible intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) system" is a major shortcoming of the US military at this stage.
A US Air Force soldier is building a satellite communication system
A study released by the US-based think-tank "New US Security Center" said that the Pentagon should invest in the development of a new generation of small satellite constellation (constellaTIons) network and information systems to ensure that the United States continues to be invincible in global military competition.
The report titled "Building the Power of the Future: Maintaining America's Leading Position in a Turbulent Environment," CNAS warned that the spread of advanced technology has caused other competitors to threaten the US in the ocean and air battlefield (especially in remote targeting and Military advantage in the field of missile defense.
For a long time, all walks of life in the United States have been worried that the US military is gradually losing its technological superiority. This concern directly contributed to the birth of this report. At the press conference, Michele Flournoy, founder of CNAS and former deputy defense minister, said that in order to deal with "Russian step by step and China's strong rise", the US military must be more Arm yourself well.
According to the research report, if the US military does not have a "flexible intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance system", it will be at a disadvantage in competition with other rivals.
CNAS analysts believe that one of the problems before the US military is that the existing air and space monitoring equipment is not enough to achieve full-scale, all-weather coverage.
Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites can only monitor the target area for hours, while drones can only stay in the target area for a few days. Only geosynchronous orbit (GEO) satellites can achieve round-the-clock, uninterrupted monitoring of designated target areas. However, the US military does not currently have enough GEO satellites to make up for the shortcomings of LEO satellites and drone equipment in intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance work.
To solve this problem, the US military needs to develop a low-cost satellite constellation system. In the report, CNAS recommended that the US military "build a future low-Earth orbit ISR satellite network with small satellites as the core". "These small satellites weigh from 0.25 pounds (about 0.11 kilograms) to 400 pounds (about 181 kilograms). The average cost per satellite is only $150,000. In contrast, the cost of a single large military satellite is often hundreds of millions of dollars.
Small satellites can easily achieve large-scale production and launch. The report said that although the performance of large military satellites is stronger, the cost of small satellites is much lower, and the military can produce thousands of small satellites to form an ISR constellation network. "
In each constellation network, a series of small satellites can work together to perform tasks that were previously performed by expensive single satellites. The number of small satellites in the constellation network is extremely large, and it can monitor more targets simultaneously than in previous military satellites. "
At the same time, the satellite constellation network has also achieved breakthroughs in terms of security performance. "The large number of small satellites makes the entire constellation network less difficult than today's US ISR satellites."
The report also believes that the US Department of Defense should also give priority to the development of cheap launch vehicles. If the future satellite constellation is built using an open architecture, the military is likely to frequently replace obsolete or damaged satellites. "If you want to quickly reorganize the ISR constellation, the US military needs to have a low-cost, fast-responding launch capability."
In addition, another priority for the US military is to strengthen the security of small satellite ground stations. The LEO satellites are orbiting relatively close to the Earth's surface, and they need to be in close contact with a large number of ground stations during their work. “When the LEO satellite is operating over a ground station that is not in operation, the satellite owner will not be able to obtain the information that the satellite collected in orbit. The hostile country is likely to use this opportunity to launch an attack.â€
Suggestions
The study warned that the Pentagon needed to carefully evaluate the construction costs of the small satellite constellation system. Although the price of a small satellite is very low, the military needs to consider a range of additional costs, such as the cost of building a new ground station and developing a constellation internal data sharing system. "That is to say, the development of a more flexible small satellite constellation system will increase the cost of US space armament construction to a certain extent, but it is completely worthwhile to do so."
While vigorously developing small satellites and forming a low-Earth orbit ISR system, the US military should also further improve the performance of GEO's large satellites. According to the report: "Due to cost reasons, large satellites in GEO will not be able to rely on 'human tactics' for security as LEO small satellites. Therefore, the military needs to improve the safety performance of these large satellites while being proactive. Ground defense."
The low Earth orbit has an altitude of only 2,000 kilometers, while the geosynchronous orbit is far above the altitude of 36,000 kilometers. The report said that such a long distance also protected the GEO satellite to some extent. "Adversaries need to master more advanced and more expensive missiles, directed-energy or electronic weapons to strike against GEO satellites."
In contrast, GEO satellite ground infrastructure is at lower risk of attack. According to the report, GEO satellites can monitor nearly one-third of the entire Earth at any time, while satellite ground stations are usually scattered over a larger area, making it difficult for opponents to locate them. With the maturity of small satellite technology, the US government needs to reassess its spending on GEO's large satellites, but at this stage, GEO satellites will still have a place in US space military facilities.
In addition to satellites, the United States should continue to invest in the development of an airborne ISR platform within the limits of the atmosphere. Such platforms can compensate for the dead zones of space satellites and can work in unexpected situations.
Provide you with the supply of pulse oximeter finger. to help you safely get back to your daily routine.
With more than 15+ yrs rich MFG experience, you can definitely trust in and cooperate with.
Our strict quality control protocol thoroughly vets every aspect of production, storage, and shipments all the way way to our end customers.
Our products include pulse Oximeter Finger, Forehead Thermometer, Automatic foam soap dispenser, etc.
Pulse Oximeter Manufacturers, oxygen saturation, oximetry
TOPNOTCH INTERNATIONAL GROUP LIMITED , https://www.micbluetooth.com